Ethics of Man, Morals of Right vs. Wrong

If the subject of right or wrong comes into argument in that what decides that which is to be right (lawful) or wrong (unlawful)? If within forms of government or even the smallest of communities majority decides. Then the argument arises just because the majority agrees it is right/wrong. Throughout history the evidence survives but the culture or governments ceases. It also brings into the argument of "might makes right". The more people who agree on the issue the more who are willing to enforce it. 

So if these ethics of man were created by man in the ideals of bettering humanity the argument becomes bias; in that it limits the potential of man, setting its structure within a set of limitations based on a naive perception of experiences. If the ethics of man were created by a "god given theory" the argument becomes bias; in the form of a god is not human and is unable to see the ideals of humanity because a god is limited to the perception of a god. If a god experienced life as a human, he still would not be able to explore that perception because he would no longer be a god but a human, and ideals or perceptions of a limitless being would no longer apply. 

Even if adapted into those ideals the expectations would also change in that they become limited to human ideals. Man putting expectation and limits with the term of god can not create those ethics, based on lack of experience and knowledge to idolize as a god would. Man is not a "god" and can not conceptualize honest forms of principal based on that lack of "limitless perception and experiences". 

Both arguments to the ethics of man are in turn equally flawed. Even with supporting arguments of how ethics of man is insight or "rule of thumb", the end result is the same in that man or god really has no idea what suits man best, because man its self is flawed. Lacking the awareness to know what it is man really wants to achieve. Individuality and expression create the initial arguments allowing the ethics of man irrelevant; forming a new law of ethics created as individuals each person has different ethical and moral code helping aid the path to his or her potential. By setting the standard to one's own ethical basis a general theory of ethics can be adapted into a form of society.